Nike and Me

When I was in the 6th grade, I found Nike; or more accurately, somehow Nike found me.

Tennis was the game of choice in my family, and we were K-Swiss people through and through.  I remember my father buying me the new sparkling white leather shoes at the Charleston Tennis Club pro shop, how the shoes smelled, how it took awhile to make the soles bend just right.  But I always felt I was dressed as a tennis player when I wore my K-Swiss to school, and it felt a little odd to be “dressed” for tennis in an elementary school classroom. 

Nike changed that.

I will never forget my first pair of Nike athletic shoes.  The style was called “Pegasus,” and they were light blue with a royal blue swoosh.  Suede, rubber, and parachute fabric all came together in footwear perfection.

In Greek mythology, Pegasus (Greek: Πήγασος, Pégasos) was a winged horse sired by Poseidon.

As did most kids at that age, I originally wanted them because the most popular girls in my school were wearing them.  But there was a difference with these shoes in their long-term effect.  When I wore my add-a-bead, or my Sassoon jeans, or carried my Bermuda bag (all status symbols I didn’t even really like but felt pressure to have), I still felt like the guy dressed in a tomato costume, sitting around the campfire in Attack of the Killer Tomatoes.  It’s a ridiculous scene with a grown man sitting in a circle of actual tomatoes.  He’s clearly not a tomato.  But they all buy it until he accidentally says, “Pass the ketchup.”  I was always one false move away from being discovered as a complete fraud.

What dawned on me with my Pegasus shoes was a feeling of being genuine.  I was no longer dressed as a tennis player, and it was even more than being dressed as an athlete.  I was dressed as a girl who could do things.  Hook, line, and sinker I bought Nike’s belief in me as a strong, capable person with unlimited potential.  And you know what?  I’m fine with that. 

It was just marketing, I realize that now 30 years later, but it shaped how I saw myself and how other people saw me.  Some professional counselors and personal coaches equate how you see yourself and how others see you with what becomes of your genuine reality.  To a certain extent, I credit Nike with shepherding me through some choppy adolescent waters.  That company was at my side through one of the most widely recognized storms of human development, and I will always have fond memories of that time.

Like adolescent love itself, there is a degree to which my affection for Nike cannot be dismantled; unfortunately, the company seems to be trying very hard to make sure I understand they don’t require me as a customer anymore.  They have large pro teams and university contracts, and they don’t seem too terribly interested in whether or not I believe in myself through athletics and fitness these days.

The first pair of “real shoes” I bought for my child was Nike.  I’ve since switched her to Saucony, as Nike’s expanding distance from the realities of women, children, and now my home state has finally made it unavoidable that we part ways.  Someone told me last week that I was simply being “politically correct” in this belief.  I couldn’t disagree more.  This is much bigger for me than some corporate mistakes.  This is 3 decades of watching a company morph into something entirely separate and apart from the beauty of its origins.  It is the sad experience of seeing a childhood hero selling out over time and losing touch with its soul as it is blinded by greed.  Nothing about it is correct in any regard.

I still dream of Pegasus.  Fly on, little dreams.  Fly on!

The Creativity Crisis, or Where Have All the Grown Ups Gone?

Newsweek magazine has a great piece out right now on The Creativity Crisis.  It makes many excellent observations that go beyond the scope of this post, but one particular concept keeps hovering in my mind, and I wonder if anyone else ever thinks about this kind of thing: Is it possible we aren’t really growing up at the same rate we used to?  Could it be that even as technical adults we are parenting with an adolescent mentality that is smothering our kids’ capacity to develop their creativity?  Children model what we do, not what we say.

Getting older doesn't always mean getting wiser.

“The accepted definition of creativity is production of something original and useful, and that’s what’s reflected in the tests. There is never one right answer. To be creative requires divergent thinking (generating many unique ideas) and then convergent thinking (combining those ideas into the best result).”

The article talks about how children today are scoring lower on creativity tests, and ponders if too much TV time is to blame.  Surely our lock-step consumer culture that feeds conformity and insecurity to children must play a role, but I think who’s spoon feeding that culture might, uncomfortably, be a bit closer to home.  A lot closer.

“Kim found creativity scores had been steadily rising, just like IQ scores, until 1990. Since then, creativity scores have consistently inched downward. ‘It’s very clear, and the decrease is very significant,’ Kim says. It is the scores of younger children in America—from kindergarten through sixth grade—for whom the decline is ‘most serious.'”

I am very frustrated by my own experience with a negative environment around divergent thinking in some of my adult peer groups.  These are not necessarily my friends, but sometimes they are.  And oddly I think I could also track the beginning of the end of comfortable disagreements between social friends and colleagues back to about 1990, the year the creativity tests started showing significant declines in our children’s abilities to think like innovators, inventers, and problem-solvers.

We used to be able to hash things out, have a drink and move on.  But there is an edge to many conversations now that feels a lot less open and trusting and confident.  I’ve come to identify what I call simply “The Look.”  It’s what I get every now and then when I express too many thoughts or ideas on a subject I thought was open for discussion, and apparently is not.  It could be mountaintop removal, or marriage, or art, or even whether or not this french toast is as good as it used to be.  The Look says you’ve crossed a line.  I am now suspicious of you.  You are saying things that open cans of worms and you really should stop now.  But it’s too late.

Things are never really the same after The Look.

I have an unprovable theory that since as a species we are living longer, we effectively have extended our developmental adolescence.  Growing up takes longer.  Taking on responsibility is delayed.  And in this murky man-child world, we are more insecure than generations before us about openly exploring divergent thinking well into our adult years.  As a group, we are more susceptible to bringing an adolescent mindset to disagreements, and therefore more easily pressured into squashing down the divergent thinking process as soon as it hits a peer pressure wall.  If this is true, it’s wreaking havoc on multiple up and coming generations in ways new and unpleasant, with consequences we have yet to discover fully.

Clearly, there are other dynamics at play.  International anxieties, the economy, the rise of the political far right, and the counter energies of the far left — all come together, then apart, then reconnect over and over again as they have around the world for centuries.  Except this time it’s us.  The good ole U.S. of A.  And it’s a really bad time to be inadvertently raising a generation of conformists who are afraid of the shadows of their own thoughts. 

Let’s have that drink and move on.  I’m buying.